Re: The 2ed Amendment as a Gun Nuts Wet Dream

"Roger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "David Lentz" <dlentz10@/*NOSPAM*/rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > Roger wrote:
> > >
> > > "Buckaroo Banzai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Steve, you can try and warp the meaning of those twenty-seven words
in
> any
> > > > manner you like, but their meaning is quite clear to any
> clear-thinking
> > > > person.  The Goverment *cannot* infringe on the individual's right
to
> keep
> > > > and bear arms.
> > >
> > > As long as they are part of a well regulated militia, you are right.
> > > Otherwise, it can, has, and continues to "infringe" on individuals
right
> to
> > > keep and bear arms.
> > >
> > > Look at the court cases. You're wrong.
> >
> > Wrong.  The federal government has no constitutional authority to
> > infringe on the private ownership of weapons.   The only arms the
> > federal government has any constitutional authority over or
> > government owned arms and militia in federal service.  The
> > Constitution gives the federal government no authority or what
> > weapons you may keep for your personal and family defense.
>
> You're wrong and you know you're wrong. There is gun control. It has not
> been overturned in the courts. Therefore, the government can and does
> control guns.
>
> Simple.

Thus anything the government does, and gets away with, no matter how
tyrannical, oppressive and/or Unconstitutional is just fine by you?