
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 13:06:31 -0800, "Mike Haas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >The United States Supreme Court announced this morning that it has DENIED >the Silveira vs. Lockyer Petition for Certiorari. The Supreme Court will not >hear the case. > >We should all be thankful for this. For reasons set out by long-respected >RKBA scholars, this case was disaster, now narrowly avoided for the most >part. See http://www.calgunlaws.com/ and http://NRAMembersCouncils.com/ for >articles. > >RKBA legal experts strongly suggest that those wishing to support getting a >Second Amendment case before the Supreme Court send their money to support a >case that does NOT arise in the hostile Ninth Circuit or California. Note >that there are two Second Amendment cases being litigated in the District of >Columbia now, one by the NRA and one by CATO Institute. > >Mike Haas > Any gun supporter who wants a case to go to the Supremes is a moron. Right now Americans can own guns. There are two possibilities from a Supreme Court ruling on whetther the Second Amendment permits individuals, as opposed to militias, to have guns 1. Americans can own guns 2. Americans, if states so rule, can not own guns. There is nothing to gain from a Supreme Court ruling, and a lot to lose. Are gun nuts - nuts?
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |