Re: The 2ed Amendment as a Gun Nuts Wet Dream

On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 13:54:58 GMT, "Roger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>"David Lentz" <dlentz10@/*NOSPAM*/rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>> Speedbyrd wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> > >> And that can be changed and that is what I'm doing my part to help to
>happen.
>> > >> You anti-government radicals make me tired.  You wouldn't be such a
>bigmouth without the firearm.  It's go to
>> > >> go.
>> > >
>> > >I find it amusing that my simple assertion of a fundamental right
>> > >to keep and bear arms is labeled as as anti government tirade.  I
>> > >also note that the same hoplophobe finds the Constitution be to
>> > >an impediment, much like B.J. Clinton did and the United Nations
>> > >does.
>> > >
>> > >David
>> >
>> > I'm thrilled that you're amused.
>> > Bearing arms is NOT a right, whether you like it or not.
>> >
>> >     The Speedbyrd :>
>>
>> It seems almost unfair to pick on the historically challenged.
>
>There is no individual right to keep and bear arms. Look at the court
>decisions. Look at the law. If there was such a right, the gun control laws
>on the books would have been overturned. They have not.
>
>> Such is life:


Thank you!  My point all along.  The gun freaks will grasp at any straw to make 
weapons seem a good thing.
  
    The Speedbyrd :>