
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"David Moffitt" <weaselkiller@ prodigy.net> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "Some Guy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "David Moffitt" <weaselkiller@ prodigy.net> wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > "Scout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > "Some Guy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > "Scout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > "Some Guy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > > > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > "Jani Tor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > > > > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > It sounds like it would accomplish nothing and cost lots of > > > money. > > > > > Try > > > > > > > > > showing some mechanism by which such a system would > accomplish > > > > > > anything. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think it sounds extremely logical. What's your solution to the > > > > > > > industrialized world's highest gun-suicide and gun-homicide > rate? > > > (Ref > > > > > > > Killias). > > > > > > > > > > > > Well I bet it wouldn't be fighting the symptoms, but actually > going > > > > after > > > > > > the causes. In short a real solution, not a fuzzy feel good > "chicken > > > > soap" > > > > > > approach. > > > > > > > > > > So let's hear it. > > > > > > > > Hear what? > > > > > > > > You're the one claiming to have the "solution". Odd that you can't > > > > articulate anything but the same, tried, useless and ineffective > > approach > > > > which treats the symptom rather than the cause. > > > > > > > > > "Liberalizing concealed carry laws won't lead to a return to the Wild > > West - > > > though it wouldn't be bad if it did. ... in 19th Century cattle towns, > > > homicide was confined to transient males who shot each other in saloon > > > disturbances. The per capital robbery rate was 7% of modern New York > > City's. > > > The burglary rate was 1%. Rape was unknown." David Kopel - quoted in the > > WSJ > > > 28 Feb 1994 in "Have Gun, Will Eat Out" > > > > The silence from your "correlation doesn't necessarily imply causation" > > friends is deafening. Apparently they don't apply the same standards to > > arguments that support them that they apply to arguments that oppose them. > > In other words, hypocrisy. > > %%%% Yes the leftist have cornered the market on hypocracy!! > > "If gun laws in fact worked, the sponsors of this type of legislation should > have no difficulty drawing upon long lists of examples of crime rates > reduced by such legislation. That they cannot do so after a century and a > half of trying--that they must sweep under the rug the southern attempts at > gun control in the 1870-1910 period, the northeastern attempts in the > 1920-1939 period, the attempts at both Federal and State levels in > 1965-1976 -- establishes the repeated, complete and inevitable failure of > gun laws to control serious crime." -- Orrin Hatch, 1982 Senate Report Some Guy will just duck it again. *MORT*-
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |