Re: The 2ed Amendment as a Gun Nuts Wet Dream

On 28 Nov 2003 21:37:58 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Leif Rakur)
wrote:


>Leif continuing:  If the Pennsylvania Minority had truncated its
>statement, removing the supplementary words that make "bear arms"
>literal in meaning, so that it said only "7. That the people have a
>right to bear arms," it would have been understood in its military
>meaning: "That the people have a right to render armed military
>service." Then "bear arms" would have been used as it is in the Second
>Amendment.
>

    So, your saying that the people of this country have the right to
join their own military organizations?  Albert Isham and GEE tried to
pull this same stuff and it makes as much sense now as it did then.