Re: Carcano 6.5 ballistics (was: JFK and dumb dumb bullets?)

The Lone Weasel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Chris Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 
> 
> > In article
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael
> > Ejercito says...
> >>
> >>Chris Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >>news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joseph
> >>> Oberlander says... 
> >>> 
> >>> #I know a bit about the Carcano as well and Oswald would
> >>> have had to be #the luckiest person in the world to get
> >>> all those shots off like that. 
> >>> 
> >>> Did you see the show where they had a guy with a Carcano
> >>> do a moving target 
> >>>test?  They kind of glossed over all of the misfires the
> >>>guy got.  I'm dubious of a "study" where they claim that
> >>>Oswald could have done it because a guy armed 
> >>> with a similar rifle was able to get off the requisite
> >>> number of shots after SEVERAL attempts, but discount the
> >>> number of misfires he got in the process. They based
> >>> their case on the things which proved it, while ignoring
> >>> the ones which disproved it.  If Oswald's rifle and
> >>> ammunition were "identical" to the 
> >>>ones in the test, then either he had multiple misfires
> >>>(for which I'm unaware of any evidence), OR JFK had his
> >>>driver keep driving the route until Oswald could 
> >>> successfully shoot him, as was done in the "test".
>  
> >>   So how was JFK shot?
> > 
> > Multiple shooters.
> 
> You're confusing your conspiracy theory with your experience 
> at the saloon yesterday.
> 
> Laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh.

   Gee, I wonder whom I should believe-an expert in ballistics and firearms, or you?


 Michael