
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"David Steuber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "Yardpilot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > No, one cannot, unless one accepts the premise as fact. In that case, one > > will be wrong. > > > > > > http://www.loadammo.com/Topics/March01.htm > > I missed the citations of Hatcher's Notebook there. Plagiarism > perhaps? Or maybe I just skimmed it too quickly. > > It should be noted that the velocity of 300fps is the maximum allowed > at a typical paint ball range. That's not really a valid comparison; after all, which would you rather be in the path of: a 150-grain lead bullet moving at 300fps or a nice, squishy paintball moving at 300fps? > I'm still not sure what a 'disabling wound' is supposed to be. In > any case, if the wound was as serious as the report said, that shot > was likely not into the air but right at the guy's head. Something > is amiss somewhere. The bullet definitely won't come back down with enough force to create a through-and-through wound to the skull, but I wouldn't be surprised if it could cause a concussion, or maybe even a small fracture. > I'm not saying falling bullets are harmless. Just that they can't > kill you. Not when the drop straight down from being fired straight > up. > Not unless they are over a certain weight anyway. Heavier > rounds are less affected by air drag. Shape also matters. That, next to terminal velocity, is your biggest variable. A 40-grain .22LR round would probably only leave a welt, whereas a 230-grain .45 hardball would probably be something to worry about.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |