Re: Bush to troops "You are defending america from danger"

On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 18:03:23 +1300, Gregory Procter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>
>Bob wrote:
>
>
>>
>> actually we had none with bin laden (cf fisk's interview with bin
>> laden, nov. 2001, "GQ" magazine). and, in case you hadnt noticed, it's
>> bad form, and definitely dangerous to your health, to give aid to
>> america's enemies.
>
>Duhh, the USa is their enemy - you attacked them - remember?

DUH!! i guess we should have waited until he attacked first?

wrong answer. they did that already. they dont get  a second chance.

>
>>
>>
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> and, should we wait UNTIL iraq developed WMD's? why?
>> >
>> >It's much safer to invade nations _before_ they have weapons for self
>> >defence!
>>
>> ROFLMAO!! tell it to the kurds. what was hussein defending when he
>> murdered them with poison gas.
>
>The US provided poisonous gas, applied by US supplied helicopters.

i guess to the brain dead this lie they read on a bumpersticker must
be true because they said it.

proof that we supplied poison gas? why, none. none at all.

>
>>
>>
>> >
>> >> as to the
>> >> capability, they had PROGRAMS to develop them which would have been
>> >> pursued as soon as the international coalition stopped looking for
>> >> them
>> >>
>> >
>> >I have a program for an Elvis concert - does that make me Elvis???
>> >
>> no, it merely confirms your abject stupidity. blinding, total
>> stupdity.
>
>This from someone who supports invading a nation to rid it of WMDs it didn't
>have <sheesh>

says the guy who thinks we should wait until auckland disappears in a
mushroom cloud before we take action.
---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field

check my blog at:
http://www.bobview.blogspot.com/