
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
While I was fishing in the dull canal, Scout crept softly through the vegetation, mumbling - > > "Karl Hungus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> "AH#49" <"AssholeT#49"@ your.net> wrote in message >> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > Karl Hungus wrote: >> > > >> > > "Some Guy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > >> > > > Thats disingenuous. Nobody is saying such a thing. A >> > > > suicidal person >> with >> > > a >> > > > gun is much more likely to die than a suicidal >> > > > person without a gun. >> > > >> > > True. >> > >> > Not true. >> >> >> My bad. I was trying to make the point that a gun is a >> more effective > means >> of offing oneself than some other means, but that suicide >> remains means independent. > > and some other methods are more effective....in the end > it's basically a wash, and the rate remains unchanged. Of course none of you do, or can, cite actual research supporting your assertions. -- Argumentum ad ignorantiam Examples: Since you cannot prove that ghosts do not exist, they must exist. Stephen Downes Guide to the Logical Fallacies
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |