
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Some Guy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "David Lentz" <dlentz10@/*NOSPAM*/rochester.rr.com> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Some Guy wrote: > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > Gun registration is too inherently risky to risk in a free > > > > > society. History has shown that gun registration enables gun > > > > > confiscation. First the state asks you to register our firearms > > > > > and then the state takes them. You can't argue it, because it > > > > > has happened too many times. > > > > > > > > > > The state has no need to know which of her citizens are armed or > > > > > not. > > > > > > > > Thank you sir! > > > > > > Which is the most realistic threat: government tyranny or armed > criminals? > > > Registration seems like a small thing to ask to reduce armaments in the > > > hands of thugs. > > > > > > Remember, its a democray so the government is supposed to perform the > will > > > of the people (if people participate). Criminals do us no such favors. > > > > State tyrants are infinitely more dangerous than civilian > > tyrants. The leading cause of death in the previous century was > > democide, the killing a country's citizens by her government. > > You look at the greatest murders of all time, Joseph Stalin, Mao > > Tse Tung, Pol Pot and they were state tyrants. A free state can > > not exist where the state is armed but her citizens are not. > > Slaves are not allowed to own weapons. Free men are. Are you a > > man or a slave? Don't bother to answer. > > > > David > > Ok, I'll make a deal. You worry about the gummint coming to > black-helipcopter your motor home to a prison camp in New Mexico, and I'll > worry about paying for my kids education. To each his own. .....I'm just sitting here thinking how you would have sounded as a Jew in 1930's Germany. Somehow, I don't think your faith in the government would have been justified.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |