Re: The Armed Citizen - Missouri

"Some Guy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Scout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > "Some Guy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > "Scout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > > "Some Guy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > > > > You hurt my feelings mon cher cerveau Mort. The reason for
focusing
> on
> > > > that
> > > > > age range is that parental resposibility exists up to age 19.
> > > >
> > > > Bullshit.
> > > >
> > > > Free hint. At the age of 18 ALL parental responsibility is legally
> ended
> > > and
> > > > the person is considered to be a adult fully able to make, and take
> > > > responsibility for, all of their choices.
> > > >
> > > > If you had said age 17, you might have had a point.....but 19?
> > >
> > > Why does this all matter so much?
> >
> > Well I suppose it's really only matters if the difference between the
> truth
> > and a lie are important to you.
> >
> > Given your attitude.....I can understand why you have to ask why the
> > difference between a lie and the truth matters...
>
> The Age of Majority

Interesting but not relevant. Since your source does not control for those
states where adults are included in the age limits set.

At most you have shown that addressing 18 and 19 year olds as children is
improper, since by your own source some of these are NOT.

Backpedal all you like, but the fact remains that those over 18 and 19 are
not children.