
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Leif Rakur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > David Lentz <dlentz10@/*NOSPAM*/rochester.rr.com> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > Leif Rakur wrote: > > > > <snip> > > > > > Leif speaking: The Second Amendment is NOT incorporated under the 14 > > > Amendment. Presser is good law. The states, insofar as the Second > > > Amendment is concerned, pass whatever kind of gun legislation they > > > want. The Second Amendment protects the right of the people > > > collectively to maintain their own state militia even if Congress > > > should fail to do its constitutional part in that respect. It's hard > > > to see how that provision could be applied AGAINST the states. > > > > The idea that constitutional rights must somehow be incorporated > > by the Supreme Court is a totally absurd idea devoid of merit. > > There is no language either in the Fourteenth Amendment or > > anywhere in the Constitution, which would give the Supreme Court > > any power to decide which constitutional rights are protected and > > which are not. > > > > David > > Leif speaking: Opinions opinions. The reality is that the Supreme > Court DOES > decide what gets incorporated under the 14th Amendment. Actually, no they do not get to decide.....reference the 10th Amendment. > They think > that's their job. So? They can think the moon is made of cheese as well, but that isn't going to make it so. I will simply note your acceptance of a tyrannical assumption of powers in violation of the Constitution, and tell us we are suppose to trust these same bozo's to uphold the Constitution. > -Leif
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |