Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Talk Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: The Armed Citizen - Missouri



"David Hartung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "David Lentz" <dlentz10@/*NOSPAM*/rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Gun registration is too inherently risky to risk in a free
> > society.  History has shown that gun registration enables gun
> > confiscation.  First the state asks you to register our firearms
> > and then the state takes them.   You can't argue it, because it
> > has happened too many times.
> >
> > The state has no need to know which of her citizens are armed or
> > not.
>
> Thank you sir!

Which is the most realistic threat: government tyranny or armed criminals?
Registration seems like a small thing to ask to reduce armaments in the
hands of thugs.

Remember, its a democray so the government is supposed to perform the will
of the people (if people participate). Criminals do us no such favors.

SG





<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.