
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"David Hartung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "David Lentz" <dlentz10@/*NOSPAM*/rochester.rr.com> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Gun registration is too inherently risky to risk in a free > > society. History has shown that gun registration enables gun > > confiscation. First the state asks you to register our firearms > > and then the state takes them. You can't argue it, because it > > has happened too many times. > > > > The state has no need to know which of her citizens are armed or > > not. > > Thank you sir! Which is the most realistic threat: government tyranny or armed criminals? Registration seems like a small thing to ask to reduce armaments in the hands of thugs. Remember, its a democray so the government is supposed to perform the will of the people (if people participate). Criminals do us no such favors. SG
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |