
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"cor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > You see, I think the point was not so much that the 2nd ammendment gives Let me suggest to you -AGAIN- that you not discuss the Constitution with people who have studied it until you can spell "amendment." The reader gets the direct impression that you have not actually read or studied the Constitution yourself, but, rather, are regurgitating something somebody told you. No...wait..."amendment" is the WESTERN spelling, huh? > the right to the people to conform organized armed militias, "conform"? Who are you, man? Mike Tyson?! "The 2nd Ammendment guarantificates all personages the right to conform and establify organized militianaries for the purposages of defending the peoplages!" > but that it was not a good idea to rub the faces of the victims and their families > on the 9 mm gun ammunition that they could legally buy at Kmart. Why would anybody rub the faces of people on ammunition? Grease the cartridges perhaps? Yeesh. -c
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |