
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
The Lone Weasel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: >> Therefore the NG can not be "the" militia since it doesn't >> meet the criteria discussed by those who wrote the >> constitution nor does it adhere to the restrictions on a >> militia called forth in the constitution. > > The U.S. Constitution says that Congress has power "to > provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the > Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be > employed in the Service of the United States..." > That means Congress decides what kind of militia we have, not > you Sweepy. Actually, no it doesn't. It states that the feds have the power to decide what kind of militia will be "employed in the Service of the United States..." It does not say that the feds have to power to decide on state militias. -- Sleep well tonight.........RD (The Sandman) http://home.comcast.net/~rdsandman Isn't it interesting that real *full* automatic assault weapons are legal to own while lookalike *semi* automatic assault weapons are banned. "It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong" Author Thomas Sowell
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |