
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Mongo Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >In talk.politics.guns "Some Guy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >"COGunWoman55" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Interesting suicide rate chart, comparing nations: > >> http://tinyurl.com/wk4i > > > >The old causation gambit. > > > >Of course an inanimate object doesn't cause anything. But what do you think > >will be the difference in outcome to a suicidal person if he tries a non-gun > >method (average 5% "success" rate) or a gun (85% "success" rate). > > > >It's common sense. The country-by-country comparison is irrelevant. > > They'll find a successful way to kill themselves. People all over the > world manage, proving the lack of cultural bias. > > >Just ask yourself, if you had a friend who had a clinically depressed > >teenage son, and your friend asked you if he should buy a gun, what would > >you say to him? > > "Let me know when you get it and we'll go to the range together." > > >By the say, Kleck claims there is no relationship between suicide rates and > >gun ownership, but he had to jump through some complicated statisical hoops > >to reach that conclusion. Again, it goes against common sense. > > What goes against common sense is saying guns somehow "cause" suicide. Thats disingenuous. Nobody is saying such a thing. A suicidal person with a gun is much more likely to die than a suicidal person without a gun. SG
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |