
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
>In talk.politics.guns "Some Guy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >"COGunWoman55" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Interesting suicide rate chart, comparing nations: >> http://tinyurl.com/wk4i > >The old causation gambit. > >Of course an inanimate object doesn't cause anything. But what do you think >will be the difference in outcome to a suicidal person if he tries a non-gun >method (average 5% "success" rate) or a gun (85% "success" rate). > >It's common sense. The country-by-country comparison is irrelevant. They'll find a successful way to kill themselves. People all over the world manage, proving the lack of cultural bias. >Just ask yourself, if you had a friend who had a clinically depressed >teenage son, and your friend asked you if he should buy a gun, what would >you say to him? "Let me know when you get it and we'll go to the range together." >By the say, Kleck claims there is no relationship between suicide rates and >gun ownership, but he had to jump through some complicated statisical hoops >to reach that conclusion. Again, it goes against common sense. What goes against common sense is saying guns somehow "cause" suicide.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |