
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Don Homuth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 07:21:34 GMT, "Koc77" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >The second amendment states that "A well regulated Militia, being necessary > >to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear > >Arms, shall not be infringed." When the constitution was written, all able > >bodied males were the militia. > > But *not* the Militia -- as described within the Constitution. > > That entity is described operationally in Art 1(8)(15-16) and Art > 2(2)(1). > > It never was some rump group just getting together. > > It always was for the Congress to arm, train and organize it. Its > purposes were three and three only -- and None of them was to foment > an insurrection, even obliquely. > > And that Militia is now the National Guard. > > There is no other with a Constitutional basis. Jeeezzuz! Self serv gas and the Second Amendment both in the same thread. It must be the silly season.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |