Re: Kiddie exercises his right to bear arms

"cor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> "Kevin C." wrote:
> >
> ...
> > So, by your logic, if a someone is killed by a drunk driver, we should
ban
> > car shows in the area.  How long should car shows be banned? What kind
of
> > geographic area should the car shows be banned in?  Or  Liquor! we
should
>
> maybe after that elderly man killed quite a few people in a Saturday
market,
> the AARP or AAA should have held a rally on protecting the right of the
> elderly to hold a driver's licence?
>
> You see, I think the point was not so much that the 2nd ammendment gives
> the right to the people to conform organized armed militias, but that it
> was not a good idea to rub the faces of the victims and their families
> on the 9 mm gun ammunition that they could legally buy at Kmart.
>
>
> > ban Liquor conventions too.... Wait, we were talking about guns and the
NRA.
> > Free speech isn't an issue if it's an inconvinient or unpopular
topic....
> >
> > -Kevin C.

We're going to have to agree to disagree here Cor.  The rally was 8 months
later and not in the same town the girl was murdered in.  I see no issue.
If they had held the campaign in a nearby state, it would have still been
too close and still included in Bowling for Columbine.

There was no way to cancel the Denver conference.  It was minimized as much
as possible.

The second amendment states that "A well regulated Militia, being necessary
to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear
Arms, shall not be infringed."  When the constitution was written, all able
bodied males were the militia.  If  "the people"  in the first, fourth,
ninth, and tenth amendments means the common people, how is it that "the
people" in the second amendment means the state?

Have a good one man.

-Kevin C.