
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 10:39:39 -0600, John A. Stovall
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 08:16:18 -0800, Bill Smith
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 22:35:55 GMT, Dr. Hovel T. Moon
>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=%2Fnews%2F2003%2F10%2F25%2Fncrim25.xml&secureRefresh=true&_requestid=80619
>>
>>It doesn't matter. They have, without judicial review, mob rule.
>>Anything that becomes unpopular or politically incorrect, can be
>>banned.
>> Bill Smith
>
>And you think it's any better here, given what SCOTUS did in the
>Miller Case?
>
Well yes, it is. Look at all the things the SCOTUS has shot down that
the British people have had to swallow like legislation whole.
Remember the Communications Decency Act?
Scotus has made it's mistakes and it's not as good as I'd like it to
be, but it's better than nothing.
Bill Smith
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |