
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Some Guy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "< Robin >" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > "Some Guy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > "< Robin >" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > "David Hartung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > "Some Guy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > "< Robin >" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > > > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "William David Thweatt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > > > > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > Some Guy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > > > > > : www.kidsandguns.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > : "Washington, DC -- Gun accidents and suicides took the > lives > > of > > > > > 1,200 > > > > > > > > : children and teens, plus an additional 18,358 kids 0-19 > > > years-old > > > > > were > > > > > > > > : injured by a firearm and 1,776 were killed in homicides, > > > according > > > > > to > > > > > > > new > > > > > > > > : mortality and injury data released by the CDC's National > > Center > > > > for > > > > > > > Health > > > > > > > > : Statistics and National Center for Injury Prevention and > > Control > > > > for > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > : year 2000." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 0-19? That includes 17, 18, and 19-year-old "kids" serving > > > bravely > > > > in > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > US Armed forces. I bet the vast majority of the "kids" killed > > are > > > > > gang > > > > > > > > thugs killing each other and doing the nation a favor. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The gun grabbers *have* to include 18 and 19 year old ADULTS in > > this > > > > > "kid" > > > > > > > study. If the cut off age was 17, you'd better believe the > number > > > of > > > > > gun > > > > > > > deaths would be so low as to not be worth mentioning. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just to be clear, the "kid" word came from me not from the study. > In > > > the > > > > > > study they call the group children and teens. > > > > > > > > > > I repeat, how many of these "children and teens" were engaged in > > > criminal > > > > > conduct at the time they were shot? > > > > > > > > To gun-grabbers, that's not important. It bulks up statistics, so it > > has > > > to > > > > be good. > > > > > > I somehow doubt anyone goes out to commit a crime then halfway through > > > decides to commit suicide, but if you want I'll admit it's theoretically > > > possible. > > > > You're missing the point. Why arbitrarly include 18 and 19 year old > adults > > and lump them in with minors? Why stop at 19? Why not keep going, up to, > > say, age 26? > > > > Is it possible adding 18 and 19 year olds to the stats dramatically > inflate > > those stats? Likely. > > Why not include them? Are their lives worth less? Then let's do that. Instead of breaking it down age-wise, let's include everybody. Guess what? Guns then are no longer as serious a problem, statistically speaking.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |