Re: The Armed Citizen - Missouri

"David Hartung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Some Guy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > "< Robin >" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > "William David Thweatt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Some Guy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > > : www.kidsandguns.org
> > > >
> > > > : "Washington, DC  -- Gun accidents and suicides took the lives of
> 1,200
> > > > : children and teens, plus an additional 18,358 kids 0-19 years-old
> were
> > > > : injured by a firearm and 1,776 were killed in homicides, according
> to
> > > new
> > > > : mortality and injury data released by the CDC's National Center
for
> > > Health
> > > > : Statistics and National Center for Injury Prevention and Control
for
> > the
> > > > : year 2000."
> > > >
> > > > 0-19?  That includes 17, 18, and 19-year-old "kids" serving bravely
in
> > the
> > > > US Armed forces.  I bet the vast majority of the "kids" killed are
> gang
> > > > thugs killing each other and doing the nation a favor.
> > >
> > > The gun grabbers *have* to include 18 and 19 year old ADULTS in this
> "kid"
> > > study.  If the cut off age was 17, you'd better believe the number of
> gun
> > > deaths would be so low as to not be worth mentioning.
> >
> >
> > Just to be clear, the "kid" word came from me not from the study. In the
> > study they call the group children and teens.
>
> I repeat, how many of these "children and teens" were engaged in criminal
> conduct at the time they were shot?

To gun-grabbers, that's not important.  It bulks up statistics, so it has to
be good.