
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Some Guy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "< Robin >" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > "William David Thweatt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Some Guy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > : www.kidsandguns.org > > > > > > : "Washington, DC -- Gun accidents and suicides took the lives of 1,200 > > > : children and teens, plus an additional 18,358 kids 0-19 years-old were > > > : injured by a firearm and 1,776 were killed in homicides, according to > > new > > > : mortality and injury data released by the CDC's National Center for > > Health > > > : Statistics and National Center for Injury Prevention and Control for > the > > > : year 2000." > > > > > > 0-19? That includes 17, 18, and 19-year-old "kids" serving bravely in > the > > > US Armed forces. I bet the vast majority of the "kids" killed are gang > > > thugs killing each other and doing the nation a favor. > > > > The gun grabbers *have* to include 18 and 19 year old ADULTS in this "kid" > > study. If the cut off age was 17, you'd better believe the number of gun > > deaths would be so low as to not be worth mentioning. > > > Just to be clear, the "kid" word came from me not from the study. In the > study they call the group children and teens. I repeat, how many of these "children and teens" were engaged in criminal conduct at the time they were shot?
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |