Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Talk Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: if our laws and executive orders require elected Pres. Hussein be hunted and gunned down "for cause" then 9-11 perpetraitorness of unelected Bush-Cheney-Rummy-Wolfy warrants the same



"Everyman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...

> Proposition:  If our laws and executive orders require elected President
> Hussein be hunted
> and gunned down "for cause" then 9-11 "perpetraitorness" of unelected
> Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld-Wolfowitz-Kissinger-Rice etc. warrants the same (no
> satire here -- the logic and law are inescapable --after all, they are
> hunting innocent Hussein for crimes they themselves have perpetrated against
> the government of the United States and the lives of over 2000 of its
> citizens for the sake of war profiteering opportunities.)

Can anyone translate that into English?

> 911 Victim Ellen Mariani Open Letter To The President Of The United States
> Thursday, 27 November 2003
> http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article5307.htm
> 
> Mr. Bush,
> 
> On September 11th you did not instruct your staff to issue a nationwide
> emergency warning/alert to advise us of the attack on America. We had to
> receive the news of the attacks via the news networks.

Yeah, he should have had the news networks stop their coverage of the
attacks to let us know we were attacked.

> In the months leading up to the attacks you were repeatedly advised of a
> possible attack on American soil.

He should have shut the whole country down and locked up - alah FDR -
every Arab looking person! Right? Surely the Bush haters would not
have objected.

> During your daily intelligence briefings

Wow!  The author is privy to those briefings!  Incredible!

> you were given information that had been uncovered that the very real
> possibility existed that certain undesirable elements would use commercial
> aircraft to destroy certain "target" buildings. You never warned the
> American people of this possible threat. Who were you protecting?

See!  The author says GWB should have shut down the country.

> When you took no responsibility towards protecting the general public from
> the possibility of attack, you were certainly not upholding the oath you
> spoke when you took office. In that oath you pledged to uphold the
> Constitution of the United States of America.

He did.  That's why all Arab lookin people weren't locked up a la FDR.

> On the morning of the attack, you and members of your staff were fully aware
> of the unfolding events...

Apparently he should have used his ESP.

> yet you chose to continue on to the Emma E. Booker
> Elementary School to proceed with a scheduled event and "photo op". While
> our nation was under attack you did not appear to blink an eye or shed a
> tear.

If ONLY you had shared your feelings in front of all those students, I
would have understood!

Gee, does the author watch too much Oprah or not?  Place your bets
here:

Jim



<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.