
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
none <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Now what, "Fox News" or "balanced report"? From that source, you > >apparently cannot have both ;-) > > So, the following is incorrect, Pierre? "Pierre"? > In the last few months, there have been a slew of books published in the > country slamming French policy with titles that translate to: "The Arrogant > French," "The French in Disarray," and "France in Free-Fall." > > "France has a great obstructive power, destructive power and this is very > dangerous for France itself," said Andre Glucksmann, author of "West Versus > West." > > Readers are snapping up books that question whether or not the policies of > French president Jacques Chirac (search) are hurting their homeland. Nobody said that information is >incorrect< - just that one should not expect >balanced< coverage from sources such as Fox News. As I wrote (when that text was discussed in t.p.e-u earlier), all the source that you presented says is that several books recently written by French authors question or criticize the French government's policy. What could be wrong with or surprising about that? Several books recently written by Americans deal with the US war in Iraq, and the constantly changing reasons presented to justify it, in a pretty critical way -- have not seen a conclusion such as "Americans Join In on Anti-US Bandwagon" (cf. Subject header) yet, though ;-) Christian
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |