
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 02:02:10 +0000, "chris.holt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Eric da Red wrote: >> George Leroy Tyrebiter Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>What people would generally agree with is that liberty is good, and >>>should be encouraged, but not without limit. >>> >>>For instance, I do not believe that people should be permitted to >>>sully the good name of our nation by using the phrase "American >>>cheese" to refer to that vile product. >>> >>>I don't think you should be able to be cruel to dogs. >>> >>>I don't think that you should be able to avoid tax. >>> >>>I mean - these are pretty basic ideas accepted by just about >>>everybody, inconsistent with your premise. >>> >>>Except the American cheese. Why peolpe permit that is beyond me. > >> Three words: grilled cheese sandwich. >> >> Mmmmmmm ... > >Are you talking about "American cheese", or "American cheese >food product"? That may be the source of contention here. > >FWIW, a common equivalent in the UK is cheese on toast, where >you have a slice of bread (or three) with cheese on top that >you put under a grill. My favourite is extra strong cheddar >(probably unobtainable in the US, I don't remember), and then >after a few minutes of melting, you add oregano, black pepper >and cayenne pepper. Melt until perfect. :-) Chris, he is talking about a synthetic product made from used tires sold in the US as "American cheese." It is not food. It is a petroleum byproduct.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |