
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Pete nospam Zakel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "roid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >methodone maintenence or heroin maintenence, which is better? > > I think that should be left up to the individual. > > >coz i have heard of people who were on methodone who switched to heroin > >because methodone made them feel sick or something. why do doctors > >prescribe methodone anyway? why not just use heroin? > > In the United States heroin is Schedule I, meaning it cannot be prescribed by > doctors for any reason. yesyes, but i wanted to know the medical value of the 2 treatments, ignoring any laws. i've come to the conclusion now that (ignoring laws) methodone IS the prefered maintenence treatment over heroin. and heroin should only be used if the person is intollerent to methodone. methodone is prefered because of it's longer lasting action. and because of it's SLOW hit, you would get less "high" (if the high is considered a problem). anyone see an error here? coz i'm basically collecting the facts on heroin/methodone (to aid my forming of opinions), and would hate to make a mistake.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |