
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 17:36:40 +0100, Eric Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >On 02-12-2003 14:01, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Brother Nate" ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> No, I am pointing out the fallacy in your assumption that >> "They're going to do it anyway". The fact of the matter is >> that most are NOT going to do it, and less use illegal drugs >> than either of the 2 legal ones. > > >And this is supposed to be a good thing? > >I would much rather my teen smoked pot than drank. > >But then I would advise my kid that booze, cigarettes coke and >methamphetamine should be avoided, and likely XTC as well. > >If the needed to get buzzed, I would advise them to stick with pot, 'shrooms >and the occasional LSD trip if it can be verified before hand what is on the >blotter. Actually, IME, the plain blotters are the best - no need for fancy artwork on the paper - even if it does look trippy. ;-) > >I suppose this public statement of parenting preferences would get my >children taken away, should I have any. > >Message: Booze is ok. Everything else isn't. Yeah, yeah, the booze is allright..... oops, the lyric is actually, "the blues is allright!" Don't take this post too seriously. > >EJ
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |