
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"GEM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > "SAP BASIS Consultant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Eric Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > > On 26-11-2003 18:27, in article > [EMAIL PROTECTED], > > > "Adam Albright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > snip > > > ---------- > Bush has had his share of verbal gaffes, as has Gore. Other > than that, what evidence is there that Bush is an idiot? I > admit that he is not a genius, but I am not quite sure of > the origins of "Bush is an idiot theory". (For some, of course, > it is the logical conclusion of the "Republicans are idiots" > theory). > ---------- > > When given the choice between beleiving that politicians are incompetent, or > deliberate criminals, the public almost always chooses the Stupid Theory > because the alternate embarrasses the public when they think about it. So > they usually don't. Think about it, that is. Its called fear. :) > > GEM thats a very good point. with bush you have to think about his lack of success in business and a certain scatterbrain aura that comes across at least to me. what bush DOES seem to excell in is politics and making ppl like him. the fucker seems to know everybody in america that matters (except me) owing to his school contacts, and his years as the president's and vice-president's son,etc. and then theres the folksy crap that appeals to "the masses".... basically, he covers large spectrums of the population. or something. i think hes probably unstoppable in 2004.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |