
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
The Prophet Brother Nate known to the wise as [EMAIL PROTECTED], opened the Book of Words, and read unto the people: >proffsl wrote: >> Legalizing drugs would put an 'effectively-unlimited supply' of >> completely legal adult customers, virtually eliminating any >> predisposition to sell drugs to children. > >And that's why legal alcohol is our #1 under-aged drug abuse >problem? The actual facts of legal substances don't bear >out your claims about what would happen to illegal ones after >legalization. *sigh* We've been through this mill many times before. Alcohol is, and has been almost everywhere and almost always the most popular drug -- regardless of local laws. Add to that the fact that alcohol has, per user, the greatest deleterious social and medical effect, for pharmacological reasons alone (very few other drugs provide quite the same blend of hepatotoxicity, neurotoxicity, aggression-induction, judgment-clouding, and hand-eye coordination deterioration that alcohol does), and we have a drug which is a major social problem any time, anywhere. From 4th-century Rome to 12th-century BC Judea to 18th-century Europe to 20th-century America, one can find ample evidence that alcohol presents a real and palpable social problem -- oddly, all these cultures knew about marijuana and opiates, and most likely cultivated them, and many had knowledge of psychotropic fungi as well; however, these drugs are so marginal both in usage and societal effect as to warrant no mention. Alcohol is a poor example to describe the effects of legalization. History demonstrates that humanity at large is likely not to be interested in drugs save alcohol, and usage of currently-illegal substances would remain minimal. This is absolutely nothing like the case with alcohol: the wave of mutilation you seem to fear resulting from legalization simply doesn't exist. >No, I am pointing out the fallacy in your assumption that >"They're going to do it anyway". The fact of the matter is >that most are NOT going to do it, and less use illegal drugs >than either of the 2 legal ones. As to alcohol, see above. It would remain the most popular no matter what legal framework is in place. +-------------------------------------------------------------+ | D. Jacob Wildstrom -- Math monkey and freelance thinker | | Graduate Student, University of California at San Diego | | "A mathematician is a device for turning coffee into | | theorems." -Alfred Renyi | +-------------------------------------------------------------+ The opinions expressed herein are not necessarily endorsed by the University of California or math department thereof.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |