Re: DOES THE 9th AMENDMENT PROTECT RESPONSIBLE REC DRUG USE?

Pete nospam Zakel wrote:
> 
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Manny Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> >There are no limits specified in the 16th amendment. Therefore congress
> >may confiscate up to 100% of a citizens income. Do you really believe the
> >people, no, wait...do you really believe *any person* would grant
> >congress the power to confiscate, by force, 100% of their income?
> 
> It would depend on what that person would get in return, wouldn't it?
> 
> I'm sure some people would agree to this.
> 
> However, I doubt a majority would agree to it.  Do you really believe that
> congress would ever pass a law that would tax everyone at 100%?

we the people have aboslutely no way to stop them from doing so -- the 16th
amendment applies no limits.  a lot of fucked up thinking was going on in the
early 20th century -- and none of it was done by "dopers."

b
-- 
citizen, patriot, stoner

Marijuana: it's nowhere near as scary as they want you to think.

visit truth: the Anti-drugwar at http://www.briancbennett.com 

Ask these former drug warriors why drugwar doesn't work: 
http://www.leap.cc