
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Pete nospam Zakel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Guido Marx) writes: > > >No doubt a similar number of these people would have been in favor of > >loyalty oaths. The father of this girl is teaching her an invaluable > >lesson. Stand up for your rights - don't just lie down and accept > >something that is wrong because a lot of other people think it's cool. > > Also this is a simplistic solution to the perceived problem that actually > has the unintended consequence of further alienating a child who may > experiment and thus possibly driving the child to more serious drug use. > > Much better to reward children who want to participate in extracurricular > activities by NOT testing them and only keeping them from engaging in the > activities if they show up actually impaired -- and allowing them back as > soon as they are not obviously impaired. > > The carrot works much better than the stick. I say take the stick and shove it up the school boards ass.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |