Re: dad campaigns to stop school drug testing

dpr wrote:
> 
> "R. Steve Walz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > dpr wrote:
> > >
> > > "R. Steve Walz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > >
> > > > > > > One that prevents *what*???
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > ColoradoSkiBum
> > > > > > ----------------------------
> > > > > > Prevents anyone from being fired unfairly, of course, such as
> > > > > > for drugs or homosexuality
> > > > >
> > > > > Nothing unfair about being fired for the above actions.
> > > > -------------
> > > > Homosexuality?
> > >
> > > When talking about private business, yes there is nothing unfair
> > > about being fired for engaging in homosexual sex acts. Some
> > > companies may want to
> > > project an image that homosexual sex acts are against that image.
> > ------------------------
> > That's a total violation of human rights,
> 
> Not at all.
-------------
Denying your crime doesn't make it so.

 
> > > > > I would rather not have a pot head working where he may cause
> > > > > harm to others because of his drug habit.
> > > > -----------------
> > > > You're under some delusion that smoking pot magically makes someone
> > > > "dangerous", it does not, any more than merely being silly, foolish,
> > >
> > > Just like Alcohol, pot affects a persons reasoning and reaction times.
> >
> > > Hence
> > > just like drinking alcohol on the job can result in injuries to other
> > > workers who have not been drinking, people who smoke pot on the job >
> also
> > > place people in danger of being harmed.
> > -----------------------
> > Nope.
> 
> Yep
---------------------
Nope. Not provably so. Hasn't been done. And they are equally violated
if they merely smoke it at home!

 
> > > If you want to smoke pot, do it at home, and off the job site.
---------------------
That's the point, if they do they are still persecuted.
Steve