Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Talk Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: Bad Cop, No Donut! Police invent novel ways of stealing DNA



On 29-10-2003 17:04, in article
[EMAIL PROTECTED], "Lt. John Hadily"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Eric Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: 10/29/2003 8:59 AM Eastern Standard Time
> Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> On 29-10-2003 14:32, in article
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Lt. John Hadily"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> Who cares. Nothing is to be derived from  your 30 years as virtual dog
>>> catcher.
>> 
>> A dog catcher? I guess you'd rather let those I've been putting in
>> jail for homicide and other crimes go now?
> 
>> Oh... now they are murderers and not pot smokers.
> 
>> Hmmmmm.
> 
> Hey numbnutz can you read?

Yes, but not all your drivel. I have a job, too.

> I wrote in here over a month ago or so that
> I was no longer assigned to narcotics, that I was assined and promoted
> as a detective Supervisor of the elite Homicide unit in my department.

The Peter principle in action obviously.

> Which means i oversee every case that comes through my department
> where a person is murdered, knucklehead.

I guess it will be much easier to murder in your town.

> I don't have to tell you how
> many murders are done by dopers right?

Is it dopers murdering or murderers engaging in drug use?
In what amount of cases are the "drugs," to blame for the murder.
I take lots of drugs, and murder would never cross my mind.


> Let's just say quite a few
> Junior.

Says you. And you are -not- an impartial observer.



> But hey no I get to put the Murderering dopers in cages for
> the maximum amount of years

Not up to you, really.

O.J. Simpson ain't behnd bars


>so they can't hurt anybody for a long
> time. It never ceases to amaze me how many dopers confess that they
> killed for their drug habits. Kind of shoots down yours and Procotrs
> and other bleeding heart liberals peaceful doper theory, doesn't it?

Not at all. Makes it stronger in fact. How can you justify prohibiting a
substance to a poor person by virtue of price which he might be motivated to
murder to get the money to satisfy his needs?

Why do you insist on spreading his misery in his addiction around to
innocents who might need to be killed given your insistence that heroin cost
huge amounts?

Why do you need to -create- victims to point to in order to justify your
existence on the public dime?



EJ




<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.