Re: jury nullification, jury veto, jury pardon

"Ken Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Yardpilot wrote:
>
> > "Ken Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>  [snip]
>
> > >   I don't have it handy, although I've listened to his show, and
recall
> > > hearing it (see http://www.indybay.org/news/2003/10/1652834.php
> > > for some of the Internet-based documentation -- there's A LOT of it
> > > out there).
> >
> > I see one vague reference from eight years ago about users. I don't see
your
> > "virulent" claim supported.
>
>   If you want more, perform a Google search.

So, you admit you can't support your claim. That is a good first step. They
sau confession is good for the soul.

> I only referred you
> to *some* of it -- and the one key statement is pretty incriminating.

You referred to very little, and that provided no support for your claim.
Remember the word "virulent" you used? It does have a meaning.