Re: jury nullification, jury veto, jury pardon

Larry wrote:

> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ken Smith
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >(Whether
> >Bush was busted for cocaine possession is debatable, but I tend to
> >accept the assertion as fact, given that the document which would
> >have indicated that fact has mysteriously been destroyed.)
>
> You accept it as true because the document that would prove it to be true
> has been destroyed?  What would you think if the document existed?!?!!
>
> Talk about someone altering the facts to fit their predetermined opinion!

  Did you ever take an evidence class?  When evidence is tampered
with, you can draw all sorts of negative inferences at trial from that
fact.  So tell me, Lar-- Why *did* George W. Bush need to have a
new driver's license issued, and why was the old record destroyed?