Re: jury nullification, jury veto, jury pardon

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Yardpilot"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>"Larry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ken Smith
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >(Whether
>> >Bush was busted for cocaine possession is debatable, but I tend to
>> >accept the assertion as fact, given that the document which would
>> >have indicated that fact has mysteriously been destroyed.)
>>
>> You accept it as true because the document that would prove it to be true
>> has been destroyed?  What would you think if the document existed?!?!!
>
>The argument that "it must be true because there is no evidence" sounds very
>much like a J. Edgar or J. Reno sort of spin. It is also the argument of a
>great many conspiracy theorists.\

Which makes sense, since Ken (i) is a conspiracy theorist, and (ii) thinks
he was denied a law license on the basis of protected first amendment
speech, something for which there is simply no evidence.