Re: jury nullification, jury veto, jury pardon

On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 20:35:35 GMT, "Scout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>
>"Jon Beaver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 23:13:50 GMT, "Cole Firearms Inc."
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >Nullification is the last chance the public has to Defend against
>> >prosecutorial misconduct, or a wrongful indictment.
>>
>> No, armed rebellion is always a choice.  It's certainly a way of
>> deciding things when it can't be decided by law.
>
>Which law would that be Constitutional law, or the law of tyranny?
>
>> For instance, we
>> decided certain fundamental disagreement over federal supremacy in the
>> Civil War.  But you'd better make sure it's a principle worth dying
>> for because that's what usually happens.
>
>Yep, but it is better to die in the cause of freedom than live in the safety
>of servitude.

Except that respecting the rights of others isn't "servitude."


- Jon Beaver