Re: jury nullification, jury veto, jury pardon

"Jon Beaver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 08:48:14 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Larry) wrote:
>
> >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jon Beaver
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 17:28:17 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Larry) wrote:
> >>
> >>>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> >>>"Scout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>"Larry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >>>>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It does exist within "the law."  It's jsut not within the "firing a
loaded
> >>>>> weapons within city limits" statute, which is ireelevant to most,
but
> >>>>> dispositive to you (for some reason).
> >>>>
> >>>>except that you can't seem to find any statutory law in which such an
> >>>>exclusion exists. Oddly the other exclusions you have presented
specifically
> >>>>spellout what exclusion exists and what offense it applies to.
> >>>
> >>>What statutes have you read?  The ones I provided for you - all FOUR of
> >>>them -- talk about the use of force.  That's not an offense.  Force can
be
> >>>applied by punches, kicks, hair pulling, use of firearms, knives,
clubs,
> >>>or sticks and stones.  Any and all of ths4e forms of "force" can be
> >>>covered by the justification statutes I cited to you.
> >>
> >>Got to stop arguing with this guy.  He's just antisocial.
> >>
> >>- Jon Beaver
> >
> >You're right.  I give up.  Which I bet means he'll claim victory over me
> >or something inane like that.
>
> Ignorance is it's own reward.

Then you must be wealthy beyond belief......