
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Yardpilot wrote: > > "Steve Krulick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Yardpilot wrote: > > > > > > "Steve Krulick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Steve Furbish wrote: > > > > > > > > > > "Yardpilot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > "Carl Nisarel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > > > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > Blind creature; and a while he didn't see. But at last > > > > > > > Yardpilot murmured, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Carl Nisarel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in > > > > > > > > message > > > > > > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > >> Blind creature; and a while he didn't see. But at last > > > > > > > >> Yardpilot murmured, > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > I read your post. You did NOT answer the question. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> He did. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your problem is that you are an uneducated liar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Like I said, You're just too fuckin' stupid to realize that > > > > > > > he did answer it. > > > > > > > > > > > > Just like you, he responded to his spin on what I wrote, not > to > > > what I > > > > > > ACTUALLY wrote. Nothing surprising in you backing another > liar. > > > > > > > > > > And exactly what "spin" would that be shitsack? Why don't you > take > > > five > > > > > seconds and use that MENSA IQ of yours to demonstrate EXACTLY > where > > > the spin > > > > > existed that magically turned that answer I provided into > something > > > null & > > > > > void? > > > > > > > > > > Put up or shut up. > > > > > > > > > > Steve > > > > > > > > He won't, because he can't! Welcome to the club, other Steve! > > > > > > Oh, look: A sockpuppet playing with a troll. How droll. > > > > Oh, look: he did exactly what I said he would, > > Nope, YEP: Oh, look: he did exactly what I said he would, not to mention snipping away the rest of the post!: He WILL side-step, sling straw, ad hom and whine, call you liar and coward, and claim he "proved" all that repeatedly, but he WON'T demonstrate what you ask for! THAT'S Yardturd's trademark M.O.! > and since you know that is untrue, How do YOU know what *I* know? Are you a mind-reader too, now? You DID side-step, sling straw, ad hom and whine, call me liar, and you've failed to demonstrate what's been asked for. > you just lied again, Nope. But you did just what I said you would! > sock > puppet. Prove it. And prove I'm a sock puppet, liar. > Your command of the language is somewhere between zilch and nil. So you blatantly assert. Again. Prima facie evidence doesn't faze your delusional self, does it? > Sometimes you are just dishonest about your inane ploys here. So you blatantly assert. Again. But you never prove it. > Most of > the time you just plain don't understand what is actually being said. Yawn. Keep whistling in the dark past the graveyard, Graveyardturd, while skating on thin ice. > Anyone here can keep you chasing your tail for months. And how did you do that while I was "killfiled" by you? Again. But as you've been dancing each time I've invoked your name, Mr. Jiggs, you are a risible and self-deluded maroon. -- Steven Krulick / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ellenville NY 12428-130727
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |