Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Talk Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: Bad Cop, No Donut! Police invent novel ways of stealing DNA



Yardpilot wrote:
> 
> "Steve Krulick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Yardpilot wrote:
> > >
> > > "Steve Krulick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Steve Furbish wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > "Yardpilot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Carl Nisarel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > Blind creature; and a while he didn't see. But at last
> > > > > > > Yardpilot murmured,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > "Carl Nisarel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> > > > > > > > message
> > > > > > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > >> Blind creature; and a while he didn't see. But at last
> > > > > > > >> Yardpilot murmured,
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> > I read your post. You did NOT answer the question.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> He did.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Your problem is that you are an uneducated liar
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Like I said, You're just too fuckin' stupid to realize that
> > > > > > > he did answer it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Just like you, he responded to his spin on what I wrote, not
> to
> > > what I
> > > > > > ACTUALLY wrote. Nothing surprising in you backing another
> liar.
> > > > >
> > > > > And exactly what "spin" would that be shitsack? Why don't you
> take
> > > five
> > > > > seconds and use that MENSA IQ of yours to demonstrate EXACTLY
> where
> > > the spin
> > > > > existed that magically turned that answer I provided into
> something
> > > null &
> > > > > void?
> > > > >
> > > > > Put up or shut up.
> > > > >
> > > > > Steve
> > > >
> > > > He won't, because he can't! Welcome to the club, other Steve!
> > >
> > > Oh, look: A sockpuppet playing with a troll. How droll.
> >
> > Oh, look: he did exactly what I said he would,
> 
> Nope,

YEP:

Oh, look: he did exactly what I said he would, not to mention
snipping away the rest of the post!:

He WILL side-step, sling straw, ad hom and whine, call you liar
and coward, and claim he "proved" all that repeatedly, but he
WON'T demonstrate what you ask for! THAT'S Yardturd's trademark
M.O.!

> and since you know that is untrue,

How do YOU know what *I* know? Are you a mind-reader too, now?

You DID side-step, sling straw, ad hom and whine, call me liar,
and you've failed to demonstrate what's been asked for.

> you just lied again,

Nope. But you did just what I said you would!

> sock
> puppet.

Prove it. And prove I'm a sock puppet, liar.

> Your command of the language is somewhere between zilch and nil.

So you blatantly assert. Again. Prima facie evidence doesn't
faze your delusional self, does it?

> Sometimes you are just dishonest about your inane ploys here.

So you blatantly assert. Again. But you never prove it.

> Most of
> the time you just plain don't understand what is actually being said.

Yawn. Keep whistling in the dark past the graveyard,
Graveyardturd, while skating on thin ice.

> Anyone here can keep you chasing your tail for months.

And how did you do that while I was "killfiled" by you? Again.

But as you've been dancing each time I've invoked your name, Mr.
Jiggs, you are a risible and self-deluded maroon.

-- 
Steven Krulick / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ellenville NY 12428-130727



<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.