Re: Bad Cop, No Donut! Police invent novel ways of stealing DNA

"Cole Firearms Inc." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> "Lt. John Hadily" wrote:
> > 
> > "Cole Firearms Inc." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL 
> > PROTECTED]>...
> > > Eric Johnson wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 03-10-2003 01:31, in article
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Denise Stewbaker"
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Please Lt. Sir could we please discuss the topic and not fling insults
> > > > > at other posters? I would honestly like to know your opinion on the
> > > > > use of police trickery in the obtaining of DNA evidence from suspects,
> > > > > as it would be refreshing to hear it coming from the point of view of
> > > > > someone involved in law enforcement.
> > > >
> > > > There is no such thing as police trickery.
> > > >
> > > > EJ
> > >
> > > Planting evidence, lying on the stand, falsifying police reports, racial
> > > profiling.
> > 
> > There is such thing as police trickery in interogation techniques, but
> > of course you two losers haven't a clue and it has nothing to do with
> > falsifying reports, lying on the stand or racial profiling. Or the
> > palnting of evidence. Oh and By the way Junior I just got bumped up to
> > a supervisor in homicide so that ought to make Johnson happy since I
> > don't have to lock up all those useless dopers anymore except when
> > they're involved in homicide investigations. Trickery is used whn I
> > question a suspect and another suspect is in another room and I tell
> > him his partner gave him up while presenting evidence to show him so,
> > or to discover who a shooter was, or as was in this thread, tricking a
> > suspect to admit DNA evidnce or hair fibers etc. by making him think
> > something else is taking place, it's all legal and upheld by the
> > constiitution. Oh and for your information Junior I don't do racial
> > profiling, only criminal profiling. Could it be possible the shoe fits
> > your foot skippy?
> 
> I started to read your response, but then I remembered, you are an
> idiot, so I stopped reading it.

More like you started reading until you realized you can't comprehend
what you're reading to draw a rational or reasonable response to
something that is truth skippy!