
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
: >> > they have hair testing for that. : : >> I think for hair testing they need the folicle - so a strand of hair : >> by itself doesn't work. : : >sounds likely -- i guess they'll have to settle for blood tests. : : Getting the follicle only gets recent use -- not much better than pee tests : or blood tests. : : The sinister part of hair tests is that some drug metabolites are captured : in the hair shaft itself, and the longer since your last haircut, they longer : the history available. I think they were referring to DNA. You can only get DNA from the hair follicle--at least that's what we were conjecturing on. So if a company insists on doing a drug test using your hair, and you allow them to yank out a strand at the follicle, then you've just given them your DNA. -- ColoradoSkiBum
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |