
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "ColoradoSkiBum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >True, but my understanding is that there are so few WBC's in urine that >you'd need a couple gallons of the stuff for it to matter--same way you >can't catch AIDS from somebody's urine. True? That's my understanding as well. Urine is essentially sterile, unless the person supplying the urine has a kidney or bladder infection. There is one drug that has been used in Asia (sorry, can't remember the name) where in the past (don't know about now) rich people would get the drug from the plant, and poor people would beg for urine from the rich people, since the active ingredient passed through unchanged. There was actually less risk for the poor because certain poisonous ingredient(s) were filtered out and did not appear in the urine. -Pete Zakel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) "Very funny, Scotty. Now beam down my clothes."
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |