Re: vote fraud

"G. Orme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> The California recall shows Diebold trying to affect
> the election outcome by moving votes from high ranked
> candidates to low ranked candidates."

It could have been worse. The ACLU and 3 judges on the US
9th Circuit tried to cancel the recent California based on a dubious
theory that the Diebold equipment was somehow better than
punch-cards. It would have been one of a very few times that
an election in progress had been cancelled in progress in any
Western democracy. The court was fooled by some snake-oil
arguments (or more likely, the court chose to adopt some
snake-oil arguments for partisan political reasons).