Re: O'Reilly Corners Bill Clinton At Dinner Party

Well, by the same token if Bush was such a patriot, why did he let the
terrorists fly into the WTC on 9-11?  He had been Prez for almost a
year at that point, it had been brot to his attention that there were
possible terrorist threats to this country, he put responding to, or
funding them on the back burner, so he could show how fast he could
refute all the 'compassionate' Repub lies he campaigned under. Hey, if
he thot it was such a big deal, he should have jumped on it first
thing, but he did not think it was any worse a problem than Clinton
did.  So, he was a lot closer to the 'action' on that day than Clinton
was.  It happened under BUSH'S watch!!
Please notice the ultra guilty look on his face when his aide bent
down to tell him of the planes flying into the buildings on 9-11, how
guilty he looked while in front of those children.  I still crack up
at the fact that Clinton was in Australia when it happened, when all
flights were grounded for days, yet he STILL made it home to tour
ground zero and comfort people before Bush got his scared ass there! 
And, who let 100's of the Saudi's secretly fly out of the country on
his orders just after 9-11?  Wasn't Clinton, that was for sure!
Frankly, I don't believe a word that O'Reilly says, any one with half
a brain can listen to him for one show and realize he is on his own
crazy agenda, and if you cross him, he screams at you, like he did at
Al Franken at that one correspondants dinner, did you see that tape? 
What an out of conrol monster he was!  Jeez, we all respect men who
lose it and scream, yell and rant/rave totally out of control at
others in public for minor reasons!  yea Bill, maybe some Zoloft would
do you some good?
Sunny

"Ultra-Lib Terminator \(ULT\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>...
> "arizonabigguy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |
> |
> | Bill Diamond wrote:
> |
> | > On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 18:04:07 +0000, Ultra-Lib Terminator (ULT) wrote:
> | >
> | >
> | >>"Out of the blue and with no preamble," he reports, "Bill Clinton
>  proceeded
> | >>to explain to me that he did everything he could to get bin Laden. He
>  said
> | >>that every time he got intelligence on Osama, he acted. ... The cruise
> | >>missiles launched at the Al Qaeda camp in Afghanistan, Clinton said,
>  missed
> | >>the villain by minutes."
> | >>
> | >>O'Reilly says that Clinton was "intense and engaging" and that he just
> | >>listened for the two minutes that it took him to plead his case.
> | >>
> | >>But the ex-president, says the Fox talker, was plainly bothered by the
> | >>perception that he let bin Laden off the hook only to see the terror
> | >>mastermind deliver his deadly blow on 9/11.
> | >>
> | >>"I believe Bill Clinton knows his legacy is shaky and is very concerned
> | >>about it," O'Reilly concludes.
> | >
> | >
> | > You know, that conclusion really pisses me off.  The assumption inherent
> | > is that Clinton should have know that Al Qaeda was planning such a
>  massive
> | > attack on the United States and that he failed to prevent it.
> | >
> | > While I love bashing Clinton on his failed policies, there's some
>  attacks
> | > that are too far below the belt to countenance.  I believe Clinton is
> | > utterly loyal to the United States.  While I don't agree with his
>  actions
> | > and policies - that doesn't mean I can support attacking his patriotism
> | > and intent to defend the country.
> | >
> | > The AQ plots were very well planned and from everything I've read and
> | > heard planned many years in advance, including planting the pilots here
>  in
> | > the US as many as ten years before the attacks.   From what's coming out
> | > now from Muhammed, there were a series of massive attacks planned,
>  ranging
> | > from bombing aircraft flying from the Phillipines to the US, to
> | > simultaneous attacks from the east and west coasts, to who knows what.
> | >
> | > For all the shortcoming in policy and ethics I believe Clinton had, I
> | > don't think he would have idly stood by and allowed the US to be
>  attacked
> | > if he knew it was happening and could have prevented it.
> | >
> | > O'Reilly's hitting below the belt.
> | >
> | > Bill
> |
> | If Clinton is so loyal to the United States, why did he sell classified
> | missile technology to China for personal gain? Remember the late Ron
> | Brown, his bagman?
> 
> Among dozens of other crimes. Remember the convicts he pardoned when he left
> office? Most of them were political cash payoffs. I can't recall the name of
> the most infamous one..was it Mark Rich?