Re: O'Reilly Corners Bill Clinton At Dinner Party

"arizonabigguy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
|
| Bill Diamond wrote:
|
| > On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 18:04:07 +0000, Ultra-Lib Terminator (ULT) wrote:
| >
| >
| >>"Out of the blue and with no preamble," he reports, "Bill Clinton
proceeded
| >>to explain to me that he did everything he could to get bin Laden. He
said
| >>that every time he got intelligence on Osama, he acted. ... The cruise
| >>missiles launched at the Al Qaeda camp in Afghanistan, Clinton said,
missed
| >>the villain by minutes."
| >>
| >>O'Reilly says that Clinton was "intense and engaging" and that he just
| >>listened for the two minutes that it took him to plead his case.
| >>
| >>But the ex-president, says the Fox talker, was plainly bothered by the
| >>perception that he let bin Laden off the hook only to see the terror
| >>mastermind deliver his deadly blow on 9/11.
| >>
| >>"I believe Bill Clinton knows his legacy is shaky and is very concerned
| >>about it," O'Reilly concludes.
| >
| >
| > You know, that conclusion really pisses me off.  The assumption inherent
| > is that Clinton should have know that Al Qaeda was planning such a
massive
| > attack on the United States and that he failed to prevent it.
| >
| > While I love bashing Clinton on his failed policies, there's some
attacks
| > that are too far below the belt to countenance.  I believe Clinton is
| > utterly loyal to the United States.  While I don't agree with his
actions
| > and policies - that doesn't mean I can support attacking his patriotism
| > and intent to defend the country.
| >
| > The AQ plots were very well planned and from everything I've read and
| > heard planned many years in advance, including planting the pilots here
in
| > the US as many as ten years before the attacks.   From what's coming out
| > now from Muhammed, there were a series of massive attacks planned,
ranging
| > from bombing aircraft flying from the Phillipines to the US, to
| > simultaneous attacks from the east and west coasts, to who knows what.
| >
| > For all the shortcoming in policy and ethics I believe Clinton had, I
| > don't think he would have idly stood by and allowed the US to be
attacked
| > if he knew it was happening and could have prevented it.
| >
| > O'Reilly's hitting below the belt.
| >
| > Bill
|
| If Clinton is so loyal to the United States, why did he sell classified
| missile technology to China for personal gain? Remember the late Ron
| Brown, his bagman?

Among dozens of other crimes. Remember the convicts he pardoned when he left
office? Most of them were political cash payoffs. I can't recall the name of
the most infamous one..was it Mark Rich?