
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Guru Google" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (LT Lee) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Guru Google) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (LT Lee) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > > > At the same time, he and his supportors are blind to the fact the the > > > > world or 98+% of the world had accepted the One China Principle over > > > > the past 40 years. This is what made him a fundamentalist and the > > > > whole TI movement a fundamentalist movement. > > > > > > Then it is a funny question why China wanna do something 98%+ of the > > > people in the world already know -- unless it is not 98%+ people know > > > yet. :) > > > > The world knows it and accepts the One China principle. In contrast, > > the TIers do not understand it. Their effort toward TI will only bring > > disaster. As the PRC is getting stronger and more indispensable part > > of the world. The ROC is becoming more and more marginalized, > > relatively speaking. > > So is Cuba vs. US. Hehe. :) > > > Wether Taiwan is ruled by the PRC is not really > > that important. Sure, it will help but not critiical. Whether the > > Taiwan government called itself ROC or ROT in reality will not affect > > the China's future development in the short run. The countries who > > uphold the One China principle will still unphold the One China > > principle. The ROT will not be recognized. > > Since you said already wether Taiwan ruled by PRc is not really > important, so why do you keep barking? > > > What is the problem then? The PRC and the ROC can co-exist as the two > > sides of a yet to be resolved civil war as long as necessary. The PRC > > and the ROT, however, cannot coexist. No legitimate government of > > China will tolerate such violation of territorial integrity. Bloodshed > > is then inevitable. > > Mr. Lee, too bad your government don't allow ROC to exist. That's the > problem. still better than ROT.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |