Re: Did the TIers care about the world?

"Guru Google" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (abianchen) wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > As long as Chen Shui-bian's government accepts The Republic of China
> > as our national name, techincally speaking, Taiwan is part of China.
>
> You keep dreaming. the problem is PRC leaves no space for ROC, so some
> people start to abandon it and believe "Taiwan" should be the name,
> and some others who support Taiwan independence take the chance and
> promote the move.

PRC and ROC have at least one thing in agreement; taiwan is part of china.

> > The only way to claim Taiwan is no longer part of China is to declare
> > Taiwan Independence, ie, ROT.  At present, USA opposes such idea.
>
> You still dreaming like CCP. :)   USA only says she do not support.
> She don't say she opposes.

"the US OPPOSES any referendum that deals with taiwan independence." this is
the latest news.

> > Whether TIers like Chen Shui-bian have balls to declare ROT which is
> > against USA's wishes remains to be seen but one thing we are very sure
> > is that TIers do not have balls to refute USA's One-China policy and
> > its opposition to TI.  When TIers like you and "Don Trickle" have
> > balls to do so, there is hope for TI [no matter what LT Lee is going
> > to say].
>
> You still dreaming like LT Lee. Hehe, now there is a referendum law.
> If Beijing pushes too hard, Taiwanese will seek for their will, even
> if that is TI in your eyes.

"the US OPPOSES any referendum that deals with taiwan independence."

> > But I doubt you TIers including Chen Shui-bian have such
> > courage and that's why Chen Shui-bian has to keep his promise - "4
> > no's policy" and you TIers dares not say a word. :^))
>
> And CCP like you have the balls to beg USA to say this and that. :^PPP

majority of taiwanese don't want TI.  they (now 80%) want status quo.
simple as that.

> > This world is full of funny people.
>
> Too bad you are not one of them. :)
>
>
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Guru Google) wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (LT Lee) wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Don Trickle) wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (LT Lee) wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > > > > > Chen declared that he would not bow to U.S. pressure to modify
recent
> > > > > > moves. Implication: he does not care about the world including
U.S.
> > > > > > interest. This is called unilateralism.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Question: Taiwan independent fundamentalists do not care about
the
> > > > > > welfare of the world. Why should the world cares about them?
> > > > >
> > > > > Simply stated, the best thing for the welfare of the world is for
> > > > > Taiwan to remain part of the world, and not part of CHina,
forever.
> > > >
> > > > 1. Whether the TIers like it or not, Taiwan is considered part of
> > > > China.
> > >
> > > Whether Beijing love it or not, people know visiting Taiwan don't
> > > require Beijing visa. :P
> > >
> > > > Reunification under 1C2S basically allow Taiwan to maintain status
quo
> > > > and leaves both sides with more resources and energy to devote to
> > > > economic development.
> > >
> > > Whether Beijing like it or not, Taiwanese are not interested in 1C2S.
> > > :)
> >
> > > > 2. Part of the world and part of China is not mutually exclusive.
> > > >
> > > > In contrast, TI fundamentalism is only a road to disaster. Bigger
> > > > disaster if the U.S. intervenes.
> > >
> > > And even bigger disaster if China still ruled by CCP.
> > >
> > > > > As I've stated time and time again, only a democractic, free, and
> > > > > independent Taiwan, is in the best interested for all sides.
> > > >
> > > > Too many crazy voters and too few rational citizens will not benefit
> > > > Taiwan or anyone. Merachants of death the exception.
> > >
> > > Taiwan should rely on sane Chinese like LT Lee, saying so many
> > > beautiful stories in his safe armchir in U.S.