
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
I just found out yesterday that the police had stopped in a traffic stop a vehicle with two people that had one of my dividend distribution checks as well as credit cards, and other personal data that they had stolen for mail boxes. Upon questioning the police officer I have found that these people have been doing this for the last three years and have been arrested numerous times but because of over crowded jails they get released after three hours to go out and rob some more mail boxes. I support violence to change there life style, They put their hand in my mail box and the cops put a bullet through their freaking head, notify the family where to pick up the bodies and charge them for the use of the ammo. Some time a Little fascism can go a long way to protect the rest of us from the slime balls out there. The Independent Rico Yungblud wrote: > > David I. Raines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > <snip> > > > There's a difference between using violence to impose a lifestyle on someone(s) > > and using force to prevent said imposition. Note that I said *force*, not > > *violence*. Blocking a blow aimed at your head definitely requires force, > > but it isn't violence. > > > > -dir > > At what point do you consider force to become violence? In your > example, what if your block does not stop further aggression? What if > they pull a knife or gun? Suppose you have warning that they are > coming with a gun and intend to kill you? > > If someone is brandishing a large knife is advancing toward me > quickly, and I have no immediate path of effective retreat, and I'm > not some kind of martial-arts expert or commando type, anything short > of me drawing a firearm and killing them will probably result in my > death or prolonged hospitalization with severe injuries. If I kill > them is that violence as opposed to mere force? > > -AA
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |