Re: Suspect's Attempt to Support His List Falls Short (Was Re: Blood Country - Texas shame)

"K D B" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > "pearl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > > > (There are more threads with crop circle info, should anyone want
to
> > > > > review each individual thread and/or post.)
> > > >
> > > > How about some specific quotes?  It's not my job to
> > > > read through volumes of verbiage to find them.  Quit shirking.
> > >
> > > I've no problem with suspect posting the truth, as I've stated it.
> >
> > That's what I figured.  You have enough controversial views that he
> > could have posted a more accurate list and still had a decent number
> > of items, if accuracy had been a concern for him.  But clearly it
> > wasn't and it makes one wonder about Usual Suspect's lack of interest
> > in being truthful.  It looks like a bad habit that he picked up from
> > his newly found buddy, jonnie.
> >
> > BTW, I didn't know which items on the list were valid and which weren't.
> > But I knew that jonnie and Usual Suspect were lying about some of
> > them.  Thanks for clarifying it (in your other post).
>
>
>   You dishonest fuckwad! ...

You know, Kevin, you would better off, as I've said before,
if you were your own person, instead of a jonnie lapdog,
which you strongly come across as to the point where you
even copy his puerile names and insults.  Be confident
enough in yourself to carve out your own identity here!


> You just snipped her entire post where she
> freely admits to believing in the most bizarre fantasies any adult
> could ever believe. Why the fuck didn't you comment. ...

What more comment do you want?  I never denied that she
believed some of the items and said so up front.  I also I
expressed doubts that she believed all of them.  So I  asked
for support from people who were promoting the list for all
the items on that list.  I was a little stunned at the inept responses.
That's still the case.  Quite a few items on the original list haven't
been supported.


> ... You have now
> relegated yourself to the level of Dreck: defending the indefensible,
> illogical, brainless bitch against all reason.

For insisting on support for all the items on a list?  No,
that was and remains very reasonable.


>    Let's recap some things she readily admits to believing:
>
>     1. Hollow earth
>     2. Inner-earth beings

Neither are in dispute, since she accepted them.

BTW these sound like metaphysical beliefs.  I thought you
didn't have a problem with them.


>     3. Flying saucers )whether they are stolen or not, she believes
> it)

Not shown yet AFAIK.


>     4. Hulda Clark's Zapper ...

Not in dispute.


>     5. Jeff Rense, ...

Not in dispute.

> ...a discredited hack who purports to report "news",
> as a credible source for information.

Discredited hacks are the people who promoted the list without
being able to support many of the items on it.


>     6. Her erroneous claim about the frigging globe patent, which she
> claims was a molehill made into a mountain. The number of posts on
> this topic before she finally gave up show she is lying. ...

Okay, Mr. Logical Mathematician:  provide the proof right here
to show that the number of posts on a topic before one finally
'gives up' is proof of lying.  Also please identify what that number
is.  Thanks in advance.


> ...Yes Bob, I
> provided the evidence in another reponse to you so don't tell another
> lie.
>
>     7. Astrology: she knows experts in the field, haha!

Not disputed.


>     8. Numerology: depending on the meaning, of course.

What does it mean?


>     9. Equates the possibility "we" may not be alone in the univers
> with the idea there are currently aliens among us.

Maybe but I need a cite for that.  Make sure that it "equates" the two
beliefs.


>     10. An "open mind" on the existence of leprachauns. As Usual
> Suspect put it, she's "agnostic" concerning leprechauns.

So it didn't belong on the list.


>     11. Channeling per "Adama of Telos".
>     12. Chemtrails.

I'm not sure I know what these are, but they're not in dispute,
because she's accepted them.


>     13. AIDS and ebola conspiracy.

Not sure about the conspiracy part.  If it were replaced
by man-made, then it wouldn't be in dispute.


>     14. Crop circles: she's seen a fucking video!!!
>     15. 9-11 conspiracy theory.

Not in dispute.


>     16. Also, just to please you Bob, I'm going to alter the online IQ
> test claim and state she believes you can retake an IQ test if you are
> unhappy with your score.

Sorry but alterations aren't allowed without retraction of the original
item first.  Somebody's got to keep you guys honest.

However, I will say that your list looks much more accurate than Usual
Suspect's.


>   There you go. Usual Suspect has his list, which he has supported, ...

He hasn't supported many items and can't.  He's apparently
going to whiff off on this.


> ... and I have mine. Please show which items on my list you wish to
> question. ...

See above.


> ...She's a kook, Bob. You know she's a kook so why do you
> continue the charade?

You're a kook, Kevin.  Your penchant for launching into bizarre
emotional diatribes proves it.


>    Kevin
> >
> > [...]